ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Hand hygiene practice compliance among healthcare workers in a tertiary healthcare hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hygiene Knowledge and Digital Health Literacy in Emergency Medical Services in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Study of EMS Personnel and Emergency Physicians with Relevance for the Development of Training Programmes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Benchmarking newborn care quality in Ghana: Evidence from structured observations of clinical practice against WHO quality standards.PloS one · 2026Observational
- Hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers before and after a CFIR-guided role-stratified intervention: a mixed-methods study in a tertiary hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice of hand hygiene among clinical nurses in a tertiary hospital in China: a cross-sectional perspective.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand hygiene is a critical practice to prevent healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). However, compliance to it among healthcare workers is very low. The study aims to assess hand hygiene practices in various situations among the healthcare workers of different departments in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. The study is a hospital-based cross-sectional observational study among 260 healthcare workers selected using the stratified Proportionate random sampling method. Healthcare workers eligible for the study were those in ward rounds, doing procedures, and having actual contact with the patients and their surroundings. Using a WHO-developed checklist, an observation technique was used to collect the hand hygiene practice data among the healthcare workers. A total of 1068 hand hygiene opportunities were observed among 260 healthcare workers. The overall hand hygiene compliance was 30%, and the compliance was observed differently among the healthcare workers, where compliance of hand hygiene for doctors, nurses, and paramedics were 37%, 35%, and 23%, respectively. The WHO "5 moments" for hand hygiene compliance, "after body fluid exposure," was found to be higher (83%), followed by "after touching the patients' surroundings" (79%), and only 11% compliance was found "before touching the patient." Hand hygiene procedures were missed by 36% of paramedics, 30% of doctors, and 20% of nurses. The study reflects the need to promote hand hygiene practices among healthcare workers to prevent HCAIs, as compliance with hand hygiene action was only 30%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.