Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39178168›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL-2): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Matthew G Davey, Noel E Donlon, Stewart R Walsh, Claire L Donohoe, PROPEL-2 Trial Collaborators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05977816 (PROPEL-2 Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05977816 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

PROPEL-2 Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) in Laparotomy Wounds: a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Standard Wound Management in Patients Following Midline Laparotomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal College of Surgeons, IrelandRan2023 to 2026Enrolled2,000ConditionsWound Surgical, Wound Infection, CosmesisArmsNegative Pressure Wound Therapy, Standard wound dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew G DaveyDepartment of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Noel E DonlonDepartment of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Stewart R WalshDepartment of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Claire L DonohoeDepartment of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-2662
PROPEL-2 Trial Collaborators

Funding

National Surgical Research Support CentreRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA proportion of patients undergoing midline laparotomy will develop surgical site infections after surgery. These complications place considerable financial burden on healthcare economies and have negative implications for patient health and quality of life. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy devices has been mooted as a pragmatic strategy to reduce surgical site infections. Nevertheless, further availability of multicentre randomized clinical trial data evaluating the prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy following midline laparotomy is warranted to definitely provide consensus in relation to these closure methods, while also deciphering potential differences among subgroups. The aim of this study is to determine whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing midline laparotomy.

methodsPROPEL-2 is a multicentre prospective randomized clinical trial designed to compare standard surgical dressings (control arm) with negative pressure wound therapy dressings (Prevena™ and PICO™ being the most commonly utilized). Patient recruitment will include adult patients aged 18 years or over, who are indicated to undergo emergency or elective laparotomy. To achieve 90% power at the 5% significance level, 1006 patients will be required in each arm, which when allowing for losses to follow-up, 10% will be added to each arm, leaving the total projected sample size to be 2013 patients, who will be recruited across a 36-month enrolment period.

conclusionThe PROPEL-2 trial will be the largest independent multicentre randomized clinical trial designed to assess the role of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients indicated to undergo midline laparotomy. The comparison of standard treatment to two commercially available negative pressure wound therapy devices will help provide consensus on the routine management of laparotomy wounds. Enrolment to PROPEL-2 began in June 2023. Registration number: NCT05977816 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

LaparotomyNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySurgical Wound InfectionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID39178168
PMCPMC11342967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.