Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39178154›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2024

Resilience and Hassles Trajectories Among Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Maria L Kurth, Suzanne C Segerstrom, Kelly D Chandler, Karen Hooker, Carolyn M Aldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria L KurthSchool of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-986X
Suzanne C SegerstromSchool of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-111X
Kelly D ChandlerSchool of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1422-1694
Karen HookerSchool of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7053-4620
Carolyn M AldwinSchool of Human Development and Family Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7461-5126

Funding

Psychosocial Determinants and Biological Pathway to Healthy Aging (Pathways)T32AG049676 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI LYNN M. MARTIRE · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
Center for Healthy Aging ResearchNIA NIH HHS T32 AG049676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite higher physical vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), older adults reported less psychological stress than younger and midlife adults during the pandemic. However, little is known about age differences in stress within later life, and most COVID-19 studies have been cross-sectional. We examined weekly hassles exposure and severity trajectories and whether these trajectories differed by age, resilience factors (higher trait resilience and education), and vulnerability factors (identifying as a woman, being a person of color, and having chronic health conditions).

methodsCommunity-dwelling adults aged 50+ in Oregon (Mage = 71.1, standard deviation = 7.3; 74% women, 89% non-Hispanic White) completed weekly online surveys across 8 weeks (April 28-June 22, 2020) during the COVID-19 stay-at-home mandate. A 2-part model estimated how age, resilience, and vulnerability factors predicted weekly odds of any hassle exposure and level of severity.

resultsAcross time, hassles exposure decreased and the rate of severity declined, but these patterns differed by age and other demographics. The old-old (estimated at age 78) remained stable in odds of any exposure, whereas the young-old (estimated at age 64) evidenced a J-shaped curve; age did not moderate the severity slopes. Furthermore, both resilience factors were associated with exposure trajectories, whereas vulnerability factors (race/ethnicity and chronic illness) were associated with levels of hassles severity. DISCUSSION: There were age differences in patterns of hassles during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, resilience and vulnerability factors also showed complex patterns, underscoring the need for future studies to focus on age differences in well-being in later life.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resilience, PsychologicalStress, PsychologicalAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedOregonAge differencesStress exposureStress severityWell-being

Identifiers

PMID39178154
PMCPMC11452745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.