Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39178032›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Transforming Digital Phenotyping Raw Data Into Actionable Biomarkers, Quality Metrics, and Data Visualizations Using Cortex Software Package: Tutorial.

James Burns, Kelly Chen, Matthew Flathers, Danielle Currey, Natalia Macrynikola, Aditya Vaidyam, Carsten Langholm, Ian Barnett, Andrew Jin Soo Byun, Erlend Lane and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

James BurnsDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-8422-4035
Kelly ChenDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-8071-6641
Matthew FlathersDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-3351-0688
Danielle CurreyDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-2290
Natalia MacrynikolaDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2988-5503
Aditya VaidyamDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2900-4561
Carsten LangholmDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-2187
Ian BarnettDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadephia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3256-5703
Andrew Jin Soo ByunDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2062-7647
Erlend LaneDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7120-2755
John TorousDivision of Digital Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5362-7937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As digital phenotyping, the capture of active and passive data from consumer devices such as smartphones, becomes more common, the need to properly process the data and derive replicable features from it has become paramount. Cortex is an open-source data processing pipeline for digital phenotyping data, optimized for use with the mindLAMP apps, which is used by nearly 100 research teams across the world. Cortex is designed to help teams (1) assess digital phenotyping data quality in real time, (2) derive replicable clinical features from the data, and (3) enable easy-to-share data visualizations. Cortex offers many options to work with digital phenotyping data, although some common approaches are likely of value to all teams using it. This paper highlights the reasoning, code, and example steps necessary to fully work with digital phenotyping data in a streamlined manner. Covering how to work with the data, assess its quality, derive features, and visualize findings, this paper is designed to offer the reader the knowledge and skills to apply toward analyzing any digital phenotyping data set. More specifically, the paper will teach the reader the ins and outs of the Cortex Python package. This includes background information on its interaction with the mindLAMP platform, some basic commands to learn what data can be pulled and how, and more advanced use of the package mixed with basic Python with the goal of creating a correlation matrix. After the tutorial, different use cases of Cortex are discussed, along with limitations. Toward highlighting clinical applications, this paper also provides 3 easy ways to implement examples of Cortex use in real-world settings. By understanding how to work with digital phenotyping data and providing ready-to-deploy code with Cortex, the paper aims to show how the new field of digital phenotyping can be both accessible to all and rigorous in methodology.

Indexed as

PhenotypeSoftwareBiomarkersData VisualizationHumansBiomarkersappappsclinicalCortexdata analysisdata processingdata setdata visualizationdigital phenotypingmental healthmethodologymindLAMPmobile phoneopen-sourcereal worldsmartphonesmartphones

Identifiers

PMID39178032
PMCPMC11380059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.