Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39177935›Full record

ReviewDrugs in R&D2024

Targeting Non-V600 Mutations in BRAF: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis and Review of the Literature.

Hirra A Chaudhary, Timothy L Cannon, Arthur Winer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs in R&D, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hirra A ChaudharyINOVA, Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA. fjt9gc@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3206-1007
Timothy L CannonINOVA, Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Arthur WinerINOVA, Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveWhile successful treatment paradigms for BRAF V600 mutations have been developed, 10% of BRAF mutations are not at V600 and lack a standard treatment regimen. This study summarizes the current body of knowledge on the treatment of non-V600 mutations and reports a single institution experience.

methodsWe conducted a literature review to summarize relevant preclinical and clinical published data on the response of non-V600 mutations to targeted therapies. We performed a retrospective analysis of INOVA Schar Cancer patients registered in our Molecular Tumor Board database with non-V600 BRAF mutations who were recipients of targeted therapy and assessed their time to next treatment and best response.

resultsPublished preclinical and clinical data have demonstrated limiting results in the response of non-V600 mutated cancers to targeted therapies. Response rates were variable for the major classes of BRAF mutations including class II and class III mutations as well as, BRAF fusions. Data collected from our INOVA cohort offered promising results with one patient achieving partial remission and two patients achieving stable disease.

conclusionsThis article reflects the current understanding of targeted therapies in non-V600 mutations. Further large-scale studies separating BRAF mutations based on their mechanism of activation will  expand our understanding.

Indexed as

MutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAgedAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID39177935
PMCPMC11455815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.