Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39177902›Full record

ArticleResearch in health services & regions2023

Managing unwarranted variation in hospital care - findings from a regional audit in Norway.

H P Eide, P Barach, E Søreide, C Thoresen, O Tjomsland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in health services & regions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H P EideSouthern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway.
P BarachDepartment of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
E SøreideUniversity of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
C ThoresenSouthern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway.
O TjomslandSouthern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Parkgata 36, Hamar, 2317, Norway. ole.tjomsland@helse-sorost.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6035-6768

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThere has been increasing focus and research over the past decades on defining, identifying, visualizing and reducing unwarranted clinical variation in clinical practice. Both clinician-driven initiatives such as the US based "Choosing Wisely" campaign and the top-down driven "Evidence-based intervention programme (EBI)" launched by NHS UK to improve quality of care by reducing unnecessary interventions have shown marginal results. We present the findings from a mixed-methods audit performed to evaluate the compliance by senior hospital leaders of a new regional strategy to reduce unwarranted variation in outcomes and utilization rates.

methodsSeventy-five mid- to senior-division and department leaders from eight hospital trusts in South-Eastern Norway Regional Trust (HSO) were invited to participate in evaluating the response and compliance of the regional leadership strategy for reducing unwarranted variation in patient outcomes and service utilization rates.

resultsThe audit revealed that the aim of reducing unwanted variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management. There was varying use of data from the national quality registers and health atlases for quality improvement. One third of the clinical leaders reported a lack of scrutiny of their work and were insufficiently aware of the HSO's top-management and the hospital's Boards strategic expectations about the importance of reducing unwarranted variation in their hospital utilization.

conclusionsWe found that the strategic aim of reducing unwanted clinical variation was not clearly communicated by senior HSO management to hospital boards and senior management. The hospitals could benefit from a better understanding of causes of variation by strengthening their efforts to reduce unwarranted variation in utilization rates as a key element in improving health care quality and patient safety. The findings of the audit are relevant for other healthcare organizations trying to improve their quality and reduce unnecessary variation.

Indexed as

Governing boardHealth careLeadershipOutcome assessmentQuality improvementQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID39177902
PMCPMC11281730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.