SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2024
Systematic review of dupilumab safety and efficacy for treatment of keloid scars.
Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A rare case of keloid combined with bullous pemphigoid.Dermatology reports · 2026Article
- Cellular Senescence in Keloid Pathology: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Potential Therapeutic Targets.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Deciphering the cellular landscape of pathological scars.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Advances in the interplay between mechanical forces and inflammatory immunity in keloid formation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Exploration of novel therapeutic targets for keloids based on clinical and molecular data: the role of the IL-4/IL-13 signaling pathway.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Fibrotic Disease of the Skin and Lung: Shared Pathways, Environmental Drivers, and Therapeutic Opportunities in a Changing Climate.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keloids, characterized by excessive scar formation following dermal inflammation, pose a therapeutic challenge due to high recurrence rates. Radiation therapy, contraindicated in children, can minimize recurrence post-surgical removal. Dupilumab, which inhibits the pro-fibrotic interleukin-4/interleukin-13 axis, may effectively manage keloids when intralesional corticosteroid injections are unsuccessful. It may also prevent recurrence post-surgery in pediatric patients. This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of keloids. Through a systematic search adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we identified and analyzed outcomes from three case reports and three case series studies, totaling 15 patients. Results indicate variable responses to treatment, including significant improvements, no clinical change, and worsening of keloid symptoms. Additional research is needed to recommend using dupilumab to treat keloids (Grade D). Treatment response variability may be linked to differences in interleukin-4/interleukin-13 activity between active and inactive keloids. Additionally, the unintended promotion of T helper 17 cell differentiation by dupilumab may worsen keloids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39177869What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.