Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39177849›Full record

ArticleResearch in health services & regions2023

The ambulatory care of patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19.

Christoph Strumann, Wolfgang C G von Meißner, Paul-Georg Blickle, Jost Steinhäuser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in health services & regions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christoph StrumannInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23538, Germany. c.strumann@uni-luebeck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-6543
Wolfgang C G von MeißnerInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23538, Germany.
Paul-Georg BlickleInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23538, Germany.
Jost SteinhäuserInstitute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, 23538, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing number of patients that do not make a rapid or full recovery from a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and suffer from the so-called "long-COVID" or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). The long-term implications for health services are expected to be substantial. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the utilization of outpatient services from primary and secondary care. Further, we evaluated the multidisciplinary ambulatory care management of PASC patients in Germany.

methodsAll members of the Physician network "MEDI Baden-Württemberg e.V.", i.e., 1,263 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 1,772 specialists working in secondary care were invited to participate in a questionnaire surveying routine data regarding the general care situation at the physician practice level of patients suffering from PASC. Bivariate analyses were applied to consider potential differences between primary and secondary care.

resultsIn total, 194 physicians participated in this survey (response rates of 9.6% (primary care) and 4.1% (secondary care). On average, each physician treated 31.9 PASC patients. Most PASC patients (61.2%) had three or more long-COVID symptoms. On average, 10.6 PASC patients visited a physicians' practice per quarter. The additional consulting effort for treating PASC patients was 34.1 min (median: 20 min) and higher in primary care. Most PCPs (71.1%) integrated secondary care in the treatment of their PASC patients. Less than half of the PASC patients (42.0%) sought secondary care with a referral from primary care. 5.7 patients visited the physicians' practices per week, who were concerned about suffering from PASC without any following medical confirmation. This caused an average additional effort for the physicians of 17.5 min per visit. There were no differences between rural and urban areas.

conclusionOur results reveal that there is a substantial additional consulting effort for treating PASC patients that is especially high in primary care. The additional consulting effort results from the consultation of a particular high number of patients that are concerned about suffering from PACS without a following medical confirmation. To guarantee a high quality and adequate provision of care for a potentially further increasing number of concerned patients, the ambulatory health services should be strengthened and adequately compensated.

Indexed as

Covid-19GermanyLong-covidPost-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)Post-CovidPrimary careSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39177849
PMCPMC9943722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.