Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39177844›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Development and validation of a novel nomogram to avoid unnecessary biopsy in patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml.

Hong Zeng, Yuntian Chen, Jinge Zhao, Jindong Dai, Yandong Xie, Minghao Wang, Qian Wang, Nanwei Xu, Junru Chen, Guangxi Sun and 2 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hong Zeng *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yuntian Chen *Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jinge Zhao *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jindong Dai *Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yandong XieDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Minghao WangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Qian WangDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Nanwei XuDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Junru ChenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Guangxi SunDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. sungx077@126.com.
Hao ZengDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. kucaizeng@163.com.
Pengfei ShenDepartment of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. cdhx510@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0370-0411

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC21020, ZYGD22004Bethune Foundation, Oncology Basic Research Program X-J-2020-016Bethune Foundation, Urological Oncology Special Research Fund mnzl202002, mnzl202007National Natural Science Foundation of China 82203110, 82172785, and 81974398Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2021YFS0119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a prediction model for identifying non-prostate cancer (non-PCa) in biopsy-naive patients with PI-RADS category ≥ 4 lesions and PSA ≤ 20 ng/ml to avoid unnecessary biopsy. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible patients who underwent transperineal biopsies at West China Hospital between 2018 and 2022 were included. The patients were randomly divided into training cohort (70%) and validation cohort (30%). Logistic regression was used to screen for independent predictors of non-PCa, and a nomogram was constructed based on the regression coefficients. The discrimination and calibration were assessed by the C-index and calibration plots, respectively. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) were applied to measure the clinical net benefit.

resultsA total of 1580 patients were included, with 634 non-PCa. Age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and lesion zone were independent predictors incorporated into the optimal prediction model, and a corresponding nomogram was constructed ( https://nomogramscu.shinyapps.io/PI-RADS-4-5/ ). The model achieved a C-index of 0.931 (95% CI, 0.910-0.953) in the validation cohort. The DCA and CIC demonstrated an increased net benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. At biopsy-free thresholds of 60%, 70%, and 80%, the nomogram was able to avoid 74.0%, 65.8%, and 55.6% of unnecessary biopsies against 9.0%, 5.0%, and 3.6% of missed PCa (or 35.9%, 30.2% and 25.1% of foregone biopsies, respectively).

conclusionThe developed nomogram has favorable predictive capability and clinical utility can help identify non-PCa to support clinical decision-making and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Indexed as

NomogramsProstateProstate-Specific AntigenUnnecessary ProceduresAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenApparent diffusion coefficientBiopsyMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingNomogramsPI-RADSProstatic neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.