SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
The superior mesenteric artery angle in diagnosis of nutcracker syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nutcracker syndrome in 2026: a nephrologist-oriented diagnosis and management.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Pediatric Varicocele as the Presenting Sign of Nutcracker Syndrome: An Ultrasound Case Report.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNutcracker syndrome (NCS) can be caused by narrowness of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) angle. Nevertheless, the cut-off value of the SMA angle is controversial and variable. Therefore, the present study evaluated the optimal SMA angle to maximize diagnostic performance for NCS diagnosis by conducting a meta-analysis.
methodsWe comprehensively searched the English literature related to the diagnosis of NCS from the perspective of SMA (from the date of database inception to June 2022). The accuracy of an SMA angle less than 41° in the diagnosis of NCS was evaluated by calculating the pooled sensitivity (SEN), pooled specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) value. The I
resultsSix studies (526 patients) met the inclusion criteria. SEN and SPE were 0.94 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80-0.99) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.65-0.94), respectively. The LR + value was 6.0, and the LR- value was 0.07, revealing that SMA angles less than 41° exhibited an excellent ability to help confirm or exclude NCS. Additionally, SROC curves showed that the AUC of SMA angles less than 41° for the diagnosis of NCS was 0.96, indicating that SMA angles less than 41° have good efficacy for helping to diagnose NCS.
conclusionThis study explored the diagnostic efficacy of the cut-off value of the SMA angle by meta-analysis. According to the high SPE and SEN results, SMA angles less than 41° have good efficacy in facilitating NCS diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39177776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.