ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2024
Phenotypic Spectrum and Natural History of Gillespie Syndrome. An Updated Literature Review with 2 New Cases.
Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Congenital Ataxic Phenotype of ITPR1-Related Disorders Due to Novel Missense Variants: A Video Case Series.Journal of movement disorders · 2026Article
- Disclosing the Complexities of Childhood Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGillespie syndrome is a rare disorder caused by pathogenic variants in ITPR1 gene and characterized by the typical association of cerebellar ataxia, bilateral aniridia and intellectual disability. Since its first description in 1965, less than 100 patients have been reported and only 30 with a molecular confirmation.
methodsWe present two additional cases, both carrying a loss-of-function variant in the Gly2539 amino acid residue. We describe the clinical evolution of the patients, one of whom is now 17 years old, and discuss the updated phenotypic spectrum of the disorder.
resultsThe study gives an overview on the condition, allowing to confirm important data, such as an overall positive evolution of development (with some patient not presenting intellectual disability), a clinical stability of the neurological signs (regardless of a possible progression of cerebellar atrophy) and ocular aspects, and a low prevalence of general health comorbidities. DISCUSSION: Data about development and the observation of middle-aged patients lend support to the view that Gillespie is to be considered a non-progressive cerebellar ataxia, making this concept a key point for both clinicians and therapists, and for the families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.