ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2024
Single-center experience of laparoscopic hysterectomy: analysis of one thousand five hundred and fifteen patients
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hysterectomy for oncological and non-oncological reasons in patients over 70 years of age - comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open approaches.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Laparoscopic hysterectomy has become an increasingly used surgery in recent years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign or malignant indications in a single center during a period of eight years. Material and Methods: Data of patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy in the gynecological oncology department of a university hospital over a period of eight years was analyzed retrospectively. Two groups were formed based on being operated for benign or malignant indications. Demographic characteristics and perioperative data of these groups were evaluated. Results: A total of 1,515 patients underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy. The mean age of the patients was 52.0±9.8 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.3±8.5 kg/m2. Of these, 1,219 had benign and 296 had malignant histopathology results. In the whole cohort, intraoperative complications were seen in 1.6% and postoperative complications in 3.5%. The patients in the malignant group were older, had a higher BMI and a higher comorbidity rate. The duration of operation and length of hospital stay were significantly longer in this group (p=0.0001 for all parameters). However, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, rate of blood transfusion and amount of transfusion were similar between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hysterectomy can be performed with low complication rates in benign and malignant indications, regardless of the patient’s contributing factors. However, since experience is important, financial resources and personnel training processes should be supported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.