ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2024
An international retrospective early natural history study of LAMA2-related dystrophies.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unexplained multiorgan fat embolism syndrome in a 10-year-old child with LAMA2-related congenital muscular dystrophy.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Dual AAV gene therapy using laminin-linking proteins ameliorates muscle and nerve defects in LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- A Spectrum of Pathogenic Variants in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLAMA2-related dystrophies (LAMA2-RDs) represent one of the most common forms of congenital muscular dystrophy and have historically been classified into two subtypes: complete or partial deficiency of laminin-211 (merosin). Patients with LAMA2-RD with the typical congenital phenotype manifest severe muscle weakness, delayed motor milestones, joint contractures, failure to thrive, and progressive respiratory insufficiency.
objectiveWhile a comprehensive prospective natural history study has been performed in LAMA2-RD patients over 5 years of age, the early natural history of patients with LAMA2-RD 5 years and younger has not been comprehensively characterized.
methodsWe extracted retrospective data for patients with LAMA2-RD ages birth through 5 years via the Congenital Muscle Disease International Registry (CMDIR). We analyzed the data using a phenotypic classification based on maximal motor milestones to divide patients into two phenotypic groups: "Sit" for those patients who attained that ability to remain seated and "Walk" for those patients who attained the ability to walk independently by 3.5 years of age.
resultsSixty patients with LAMA2-RD from 10 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-four patients had initiated non-invasive ventilation by age 5 years. Hospitalizations during the first years of life were often related to respiratory insufficiency. Feeding/nutritional difficulties and orthopedic issues were commonly reported. Significant elevations of creatine kinase (CK) observed during the neonatal period declined rapidly within the first few months of life.
conclusionsThis is the largest international retrospective early natural history study of LAMA2-RD to date, contributing essential data for understanding early clinical findings in LAMA2-RD which, along with the data being collected in international, prospective early natural history studies, will help to establish clinical trial readiness. Our proposed nomenclature of LAMA2-RD1 for patients who attain the ability to sit (remain seated) and LAMA2-RD2 for patients who attain the ability to walk independently is aimed at further improving LAMA2-RD classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.