ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2025
A dearth of disability-related competencies in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones 2.0.
Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A dearth of disability-related competencies in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones 2.0.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the high prevalence of disability and the frequency with which people with disabilities encounter the health care system, physicians report inadequate knowledge regarding caring for their patients with disabilities.
objectiveTo determine the number and type of disability-related competencies in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones 2.0.
designCross-sectional analysis of publicly available data to identify, via key word search, the presence of disability-related competencies using disability-related terms derived from the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health.
settingAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones 2.0.
participantsN/A
interventionsN/A
main outcome measurePresence of disability-related competencies.
resultsOver one-third (37.5%) of specialties had zero disability-related competencies. Nineteen (59.4%) included an Interpersonal and Communication Skills Milestone that mentions disability as a potential barrier to communication. No specialties had Systems-Based Practice or Practice-Based Learning and Improvement disability-related competencies. Physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) had six disability-related competencies, preventive medicine occupational and environmental medicine had three, and otolaryngology and transition year each had two.
conclusionsA minority of medical and surgical specialties had disability-related competencies outside of the Interpersonal and Communication domain. With the rising prevalence of disability and the lack of physicians with expertise in the care of people with disability, the time is now to integrate disability competencies into residencies, especially for the primary care specialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.