ArticleArtificial organs2025
Comparison of hemodialysis urea clearance using spent dialysate and Kt/Vurea equations.
Article in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of hemodialysis urea clearance using spent dialysate and Kt/Vurea equations.Artificial organs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDialysis adequacy is traditionally calculated from pre- and post-hemodialysis session serum urea concentrations and expressed as the urea reduction ratio, or Kt/Vurea. However, with increasing hemodiafiltration usage, we wished to determine whether there were any differences between standard Kt/Vurea equations and directly measured spent dialysate urea clearance.
methodsUrea clearance was measured from collected effluent dialysate and compared with various other methods of Kt/Vurea calculation, including change in total body urea from measuring pre- and post-total body water with bioimpedance and the Watson equation, by standard Kt/V equations, and online clearance measurements using effective ionic dialysance (OLC).
resultsWe compared urea clearance in 41 patients, 56.1% male, mean age 69.3 ± 12.6 years with 87.8% treated by hemodiafiltration. Reduction in total body urea was greater when estimating changes in total body urea, compared to measured dialysate losses of 58.4% (48.5-67.6) vs 71.6% (62.1-78), p < 0.01. Sessional urea clearance (Kt/Vurea) was greater using the online Solute-Solver program compared to OLC, median 1.45(1.13-1.75) vs 1.2 (0.93-1.4), and 2nd generation Kt/V equations 1.3 (1.02-1.66), p < 0.01, but not different from estimated total body urea clearance 1.36 (1.15-1.73) and dialysate clearance 1.36 (1.07-1.76). The mean bias compared to the Solute-Solver program was greatest with OLC (-0.25), compared to second-generation equations (-0.02), estimated total body clearance (-0.02) and measured dialysate clearance (-0.01).
conclusionThis study demonstrated that the result from equations estimating urea clearance indirectly from pre- and postblood samples from hemo- and hemodiafiltration treatments was highly correlated with direct measurements of dialysate urea clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.