ArticleJMIR medical education2024
Integration of ChatGPT Into a Course for Medical Students: Explorative Study on Teaching Scenarios, Students' Perception, and Applications.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of AI-Generated Content in Medical Education: Systematic Review of the Impact on Critical Thinking Abilities of Medical Students.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility study of using GPT for history-taking training in medical education: a randomized clinical trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Elucidating the transformative role of large language models in advancing anesthesiology education.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Mixed-methods study on GenAI Usage, dependence behaviors, and standardized application paths among Chinese medical students.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Generative AI's Impact on the Mental Health of Medical Students: Scenario Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Large Language Models in Medical and Dental Education: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of AI-Generated and Faculty-Authored Prosthodontic Materials.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Education: Preparing the Workforce for Clinical Applications in Diagnostics and Animal Health.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- A scoping review of the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in health profession education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Integrating AI into undergraduate medical education: an exploration of learner-centered approaches through AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing Medical Education: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Teaching-Learning Process.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Exploring the integration of AI and national quality courses in China: a study on teaching practices in nursing smart education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Assessing LLM-generated vs. expert-created clinical anatomy MCQs: a student perception-based comparative study in medical education.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Perceptions, Usage, and Educational Impact of ChatGPT Among Medical Students in Germany: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Beyond Lectures: Reimagining Psychiatric Didactics for the Age of AI.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- From Hype to Implementation: Embedding GPT-4o in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Global Health care Professionals' Perceptions of Large Language Model Use In Practice: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Understanding the gap: a balanced multi-perspective approach to defining essential digital health competencies for medical graduates.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Knowledge and use, perceptions of benefits and limitations of artificial intelligence chatbots among Italian physiotherapy students: a cross-sectional national study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Text-generating artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT offers many opportunities and challenges in medical education. Acquiring practical skills necessary for using AI in a clinical context is crucial, especially for medical education. Objective: This explorative study aimed to investigate the feasibility of integrating ChatGPT into teaching units and to evaluate the course and the importance of AI-related competencies for medical students. Since a possible application of ChatGPT in the medical field could be the generation of information for patients, we further investigated how such information is perceived by students in terms of persuasiveness and quality. Methods: ChatGPT was integrated into 3 different teaching units of a blended learning course for medical students. Using a mixed methods approach, quantitative and qualitative data were collected. As baseline data, we assessed students' characteristics, including their openness to digital innovation. The students evaluated the integration of ChatGPT into the course and shared their thoughts regarding the future of text-generating AI in medical education. The course was evaluated based on the Kirkpatrick Model, with satisfaction, learning progress, and applicable knowledge considered as key assessment levels. In ChatGPT-integrating teaching units, students evaluated videos featuring information for patients regarding their persuasiveness on treatment expectations in a self-experience experiment and critically reviewed information for patients written using ChatGPT 3.5 based on different prompts. Results: A total of 52 medical students participated in the study. The comprehensive evaluation of the course revealed elevated levels of satisfaction, learning progress, and applicability specifically in relation to the ChatGPT-integrating teaching units. Furthermore, all evaluation levels demonstrated an association with each other. Higher openness to digital innovation was associated with higher satisfaction and, to a lesser extent, with higher applicability. AI-related competencies in other courses of the medical curriculum were perceived as highly important by medical students. Qualitative analysis highlighted potential use cases of ChatGPT in teaching and learning. In ChatGPT-integrating teaching units, students rated information for patients generated using a basic ChatGPT prompt as "moderate" in terms of comprehensibility, patient safety, and the correct application of communication rules taught during the course. The students' ratings were considerably improved using an extended prompt. The same text, however, showed the smallest increase in treatment expectations when compared with information provided by humans (patient, clinician, and expert) via videos. Conclusions: This study offers valuable insights into integrating the development of AI competencies into a blended learning course. Integration of ChatGPT enhanced learning experiences for medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.