Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176608›Full record

ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2024

Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in CDSS and Patient Safety.

Yang Gong, Hua Min, Xia Jing, Ping Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yang GongUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA.
Hua MinGeorge Mason University, VA, USA.
Xia JingClemson University, SC, USA.
Ping YuUniversity of Wollongong, Australia.

Funding

Open, interoperable, and configurable clinical decision support modules for OpenMRS, OpenEMR, and beyondR01GM138589 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI JING, XIA · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM138589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring patient safety in healthcare involves training professionals and implementing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and health IT solutions to reduce errors and adverse events. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health IT has revolutionized clinical settings by enabling real-time insights and personalized recommendations. However, the use of health IT can lead to unintended consequences that are not adequately addressed during training and implementation. These consequences can hinder the maximization of benefits and limit equitable access to healthcare. In this paper, we explore the impact of AI on CDSS and health IT, discuss the challenges in educating clinical informaticians, and aim to promote patient safety through collaboration with practitioners, researchers, and educators.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalPatient SafetyHumansartificial intelligenceclinical decision support systemseducationHealth ITPatient safetytraining

Identifiers

PMID39176608
PMCPMC12145886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.