ReviewCureus2024
Evaluation of Orthodontic Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Sawtooth Waves During Rapid Eye Movement Sleep in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients.Nature and science of sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) poses a significant health burden globally, necessitating effective intervention strategies to mitigate its adverse consequences. Orthodontic treatment modalities offer promising avenues for addressing OSA by targeting the underlying anatomical abnormalities and restoring unobstructed airflow during sleep. This systematic search was conducted across multiple electronic databases using predefined search terms and inclusion criteria. Studies eligible for inclusion encompassed a range of study designs, including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, clinical trials, and observational studies. Outcome measures included changes in apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), oxygen saturation levels, polysomnographic variables, skeletal/cephalometric changes, nasal parameters, upper airway morphology, and clinical symptoms. Initially, 756 records were identified through database searches, with 21 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after meticulous screening and selection. Orthodontic interventions, including rapid maxillary expansion (RME), personalized oral appliances, mandibular positioning devices, and comprehensive orthodontic protocols, demonstrated significant promise in ameliorating OSA symptoms among paediatric populations. Improvements in AHI, nasal resistance, sleep parameters, and upper airway dimensions were consistently observed across various studies, highlighting the potential of orthodontic treatments in mitigating OSA severity. This systematic review underscores the efficacy of orthodontic treatment modalities in addressing OSA among paediatric populations. Despite certain limitations in study design and outcome measures, the review emphasizes the need for further well-designed randomized controlled trials to validate and optimize these interventions for paediatric patients with OSA. Enhanced understanding and implementation of orthodontic treatments hold promise for alleviating the burden of OSA on global health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.