ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Impact of Faculty Development Programs in Generating Self-Efficacy and Competency Among Medical Teachers in India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Maintaining the quality of teaching across India is a challenge. Teachers are equally responsible for patient care and administration. The importance of training medical teachers under the various faculty development programs (FDPs) is well accepted. A mechanism to evaluate the competencies acquired by medical teachers after attending FDPs becomes equally important. In the present study, we evaluate the impact of the various FDPs on medical teachers. Methodology A cross-sectional study was conducted for one year among 50 medical teachers attending FDPs. Ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional Ethical Committee. For quantitative data collection, the questionnaire was validated by the Scientific Approval Committee of the Institute. The study questionnaire was filled in by the participants just before and three months after attending FDPs. For qualitative data collection, in-depth Interviews (IDIs) using the Kirkpatrick model of learning evaluation were conducted. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. The thematic areas of self-efficacy and teaching competency before and after FDPs were tested using the chi-square test. P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Results There was a significant increase in self-efficacy (300 vs. 426, p
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.