Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176354›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Non-inferiority of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Immunogenicity Among Women Over 26 Years: A Systematic Review.

Omniah Andijani, Sara Alsalhi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Omniah AndijaniPreventive Medicine, Saudi Ministry of Health, Jeddah, SAU.
Sara AlsalhiPreventive Medicine, Saudi Ministry of Health, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDemonstrate the immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine for the older age group (above 26 years) to prevent HPV infection with high-risk types and argue for extending vaccination recommendations for the older age group.

methodsTwo authors searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2023 to collect information on clinical trials of HPV vaccine immunogenicity. The database search strategy used a combination of subject terms and free terms. Two authors first identified studies by reading the title, abstract, and full texts and, subsequently, based on the inclusion criteria. Studies eligible to be included are the clinical trials using one of the following types of HPV vaccines: 2vHPV, 4vHPV, and 9vHPV, and measuring the immunogenicity by the geometric mean concentration or titer (GMC/T) and seroconversion rate (SCR) among healthy women aged 9 to 55 years who had never received a prophylactic HPV vaccine, known serostatus for HPV, non-immunocompetence, or non-pregnant.

resultsThis review included nine articles, seven RCTs, and two open-labeled studies.

conclusionIn summary, we have demonstrated that the immunogenicity of the HPV vaccines is non-inferior in the older age group. Even though the GMT declines with age, the SCR is similar in all age groups regardless of the serostatus. The immunogenicity of the bivalent vaccine is superior to that of the quadrivalent vaccine for the older age group. Additionally, the vaccine is more efficient in women under the age of 26, but older women will benefit from it.

Indexed as

clinical trialshpvhuman papillomavirus vaccines: immunogenicitywomen

Identifiers

PMID39176354
PMCPMC11339578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.