Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176299›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2024

Comparative analysis of real-world data of frequent treatment sequences in metastatic prostate cancer.

Jiten Jaipuria, Ishleen Kaur, Mohammad Najmud Doja, Tanvir Ahmad, Amitabh Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rawal, Vineet Talwar, Girish Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiten JaipuriaUro-oncology division, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Ishleen KaurSchool of Engineering and Technology, Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies-Technical Campus, New Delhi, India.
Mohammad Najmud DojaIndian Institute of Information Technology, Sonepat, India.
Tanvir AhmadDepartment of Computer Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India.
Amitabh SinghUro-oncology division, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sudhir Kumar RawalUro-oncology division, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Vineet TalwarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Girish SharmaAmity Centre for Cancer Epidemiology and Cancer Research, Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The incidence of prostate cancer is increasing worldwide. A significant proportion of patients develop metastatic disease and are initially prescribed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, subsequent sequences of treatments in real-world settings that may improve overall survival remain an area of active investigation. Materials and methods: Data were collected from 384 patients presenting with de novo metastatic prostate cancer from 2011 to 2015 at a tertiary cancer center. Patients were categorized into surviving (n = 232) and deceased (n = 152) groups at the end of 3 years. Modified sequence pattern mining techniques (Generalized Sequential Pattern Mining and Sequential Pattern Discovery using Equivalence Classes) were applied to determine the exact order of the most frequent sets of treatments in each group. Results: Degarelix, as the initial form of ADT, was uniquely in the surviving group. The sequence of ADT followed by abiraterone and docetaxel was uniquely associated with a higher 3-year overall survival. Orchiectomy followed by fosfestrol was found to have a unique niche among surviving patients with a long duration of response to the initial ADT. Patients who received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy and those who received radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy were found more frequently in the deceased group. Conclusions: We identified unique treatment sequences among surviving and deceased patients at the end of 3 years. Degarelix should be the preferred form of ADT. Patients who received ADT followed by abiraterone and chemotherapy showed better results. Patients requiring palliative radiation and chemotherapy in any sequence were significantly more frequent in the deceased group, identifying the need to offer such patients the most efficacious agents and to target them in clinical trial design.

Indexed as

Hormone therapyMetastatic prostate cancerSequence miningSurvival

Identifiers

PMID39176299
PMCPMC11338004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.