Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176206›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Validation and cultural translation for the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Estro-Androgenic- Symptom Questionnaire in Women.

Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato, Ana Aline Coelho Oswaldo, Camila Carvalho de Araújo, Marina Rotoli, Lúcia Costa-Paiva, Rossella Nappi, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cássia Raquel Teatin JuliatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-1195
Ana Aline Coelho OswaldoMedical School Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic CampinasSP Brazil Medical School, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2801-4397
Camila Carvalho de AraújoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-6992
Marina RotoliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0593-6876
Lúcia Costa-PaivaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9088-6700
Rossella NappiDepartment of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1713-6396
Luiz Gustavo Oliveira BritoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology School of Medical Sciences Universidade Estadual de Campinas CampinasSP Brazil Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7364-4718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to translate and validate the Estro-Androgenic-Symptom Questionnaire in Women (EASQ-W) into Brazilian Portuguese language, as we hypothesized that this tool would be consistent for addressing the specific context of hormonal symptoms in menopause. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a total of 119 women with Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) and 119 climacteric women without GSM were included. The EASQ-W was translated, and its psychometric properties were rigorously examined. Participants completed questionnaires covering sociodemographic details, the EASQ-W, and the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS). A subgroup of 173 women was re-invited after 4 weeks for test-retest analysis of the EASQ-W. Additionally, the responsiveness of the questionnaire was evaluated in 30 women who underwent oral hormonal treatment. Results: The internal consistency of the EASQ-W was found to be satisfactory in both GSM and control groups (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70). Notably, a floor effect was observed in both groups; however, a ceiling effect was only evident in the sexual domain of the GSM group. Construct validity was established by comparing the EASQ-W with the MRS, yielding statistically significant correlations (0.33831-0.64580, p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability over a 4-week period was demonstrated to be satisfactory in both the GSM and control groups (ICC 0.787-0.977). Furthermore, the EASQ-W exhibited appropriate responsiveness to oral hormonal treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study successfully translated and validated the Estro-Androgenic-Symptom Questionnaire in Women (EASQ-W) into Brazilian Portuguese, with satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

Indexed as

MenopauseTranslationsAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesCultural CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAndrogenEASQ-WEstrogenMenopauseSigns and symptomsSurveys and questionnairesValidation studies

Identifiers

PMID39176206
PMCPMC11341185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.