Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176205›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2024

Real-world data on adjuvant capecitabine after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer.

Maria Fernanda Imperio Pereira, Isabela Panzeri Carlotti Buzatto, Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara, Fabiana de Oliveira Buono, Jurandyr Moreira de Andrade, Leonardo Fleury Orlandini, Daniel Guimarães Tiezzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Fernanda Imperio PereiraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-6611
Isabela Panzeri Carlotti BuzattoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3441-0556
Hélio Humberto Angotti CarraraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0287-2422
Fabiana de Oliveira BuonoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6259-6917
Jurandyr Moreira de AndradeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-0582
Leonardo Fleury OrlandiniDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7285-6081
Daniel Guimarães TiezziDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics Ribeirão Preto Medical School Universidade de São Paulo Ribeirão PretoSP Brazil Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-0093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period. Results: We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52). Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario.

Indexed as

CapecitabineNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCapecitabineBreast neoplasmsCapecitabine/therapeutic useNeoadjuvant therapyTriple-negative breast neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39176205
PMCPMC11341194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.