Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39176166›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2024

Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy - a literature review.

Katarzyna Janik, Wojciech Niemczyk, Robert Peterek, Rafał Rój, Agnieszka Balicz, Tadeusz Morawiec

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06827223 (Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device Versus Traditional Syringe on Pain Perception During Nerve Block Anesthesia and Extraction of Mandibular Primary Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06827223 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device Versus Traditional Syringe on Pain Perception During Nerve Block Anesthesia and Extraction of Mandibular Primary Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsPain AssessmentArmscomputer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device, Traditional Syringe
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katarzyna JanikDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Wojciech NiemczykDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Robert PeterekDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Rafał RójDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Agnieszka BaliczDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.
Tadeusz MorawiecDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Pl. Akademicki 17, 41-902 Bytom, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimising pain with effective local anaesthesia is an essential step towards improving the level of dentally anxious patients' comfort during dental treatment. It can be provided by many different techniques. One of them is using the Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery systems (CCLADs). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of computerised anaesthesia with the conventional technique in terms of perceived pain. A database literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering up the period between 2015 and 2023. Only the studies comparing computerised anaesthesia technique with the use of conventional carpule were included. An overview of 20 relevant studies (n = 1347 subjects) was provided including pediatric patients, as well as the adults. The evaluated parameters were: pain, child's behaviour, heart rate, blood pressure, level of satisfaction, anxiety, further anaesthesia method preference, need for additional anaesthetic, as well as the duration of anaesthesia, measured by different scales, devices and questionnaires. The present literature review led the authors to the conclusion, that the use of CCLADs is significantly less painful than the traditional anaesthesia and it is a promising technique for helping patients deal with pain perception. However, it is advisable to conduct further research on the use of CCLAD.

Indexed as

CCLADLocal anaesthesiaPain

Identifiers

PMID39176166
PMCPMC11338014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.