ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2024
Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy - a literature review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06827223 (Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device Versus Traditional Syringe on Pain Perception During Nerve Block Anesthesia and Extraction of Mandibular Primary Molars), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device Versus Traditional Syringe on Pain Perception During Nerve Block Anesthesia and Extraction of Mandibular Primary Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of anesthetic delivery systems on pain, anxiety, and physiological responses in pediatric dental patients: A randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Comparison of computer-controlled versus conventional local anesthesia delivery systems: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Effect of Needle Insertion Angle on Pain During Labial Infiltration Anesthesia of the Anterior Maxilla: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2024Trial
- Efficacy of the TuttleNumbNow anesthesia protocol for mandibular first molars: a retrospective study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
- Orthodontic Treatment Needs in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Oral Hygiene Status in Children on the Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the reliability and educational value of YouTube videos on computer-controlled local anesthesia in dentistry.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Study on the Effect of STA Anesthesia Technique in the Extraction of Impacted Teeth in Dental Outpatients and Its Impact on Patient Anxiety Levels.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- The Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality on Dental Anxiety and Intraoperative Pain in Adults Undergoing Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimising pain with effective local anaesthesia is an essential step towards improving the level of dentally anxious patients' comfort during dental treatment. It can be provided by many different techniques. One of them is using the Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery systems (CCLADs). This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of computerised anaesthesia with the conventional technique in terms of perceived pain. A database literature search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, covering up the period between 2015 and 2023. Only the studies comparing computerised anaesthesia technique with the use of conventional carpule were included. An overview of 20 relevant studies (n = 1347 subjects) was provided including pediatric patients, as well as the adults. The evaluated parameters were: pain, child's behaviour, heart rate, blood pressure, level of satisfaction, anxiety, further anaesthesia method preference, need for additional anaesthetic, as well as the duration of anaesthesia, measured by different scales, devices and questionnaires. The present literature review led the authors to the conclusion, that the use of CCLADs is significantly less painful than the traditional anaesthesia and it is a promising technique for helping patients deal with pain perception. However, it is advisable to conduct further research on the use of CCLAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.