ArticleAsian biomedicine : research, reviews and news2024
The prooxidant-antioxidant balance in diagnosis and developmental prognosis of premature neonates with asphyxia.
Article in Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The antioxidant system in a preterm neonate is premature. The imbalance between the prooxidant and antioxidant systems can make these neonates prone to oxidative stress. Birth asphyxia is one of the factors that can disturb this balance. Objective: We studied the prooxidant-antioxidant balance (PAB) in the diagnosis and developmental prognosis of preterm neonates with asphyxia. Methods: This cohort study has been conducted between 2016 and 2022 with 2 years follow-up on 183 premature neonates admitted to Ghaem Hospital Mashhad, by using a convenience sampling method. The data-collection tool and the researcher-made checklist included the mothers' and the neonate's information, and the third segment included laboratory information. PAB was studied by using standard solutions and the Enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) method. After discharging the newborns from the hospital, they were under follow-up at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months, by using the Denver II test. PAB was compared among newborns with asphyxia, those without asphyxia, and also newborns with normal and abnormal outcomes in both groups. Results: The mean ± standard deviation of the PAB factor reported is as follows: in newborns without asphyxia (21.00 ± 18.14 HK), those with asphyxia (31.00 ± 45.42 HK), in newborns with asphyxia having abnormal outcomes (40.00 ± 60.84 HK), and those having normal outcomes (21.00 ± 18.67 HK) ( Conclusion: The PAB index showed a significant increase after asphyxia. It can be used as a diagnostic marker for the prognosis of premature newborns with asphyxia. Thus, diagnosis and prognosis of asphyxia in premature newborns can be predicted by using the PAB index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.