ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2024
Profound improvement in vision and electroretinogram after intensive steroid treatment in unexplained visual loss after silicone oil removal.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- F4H5 Alleviates Increased Outflow Resistance Induced by Emulsified Silicone Oil In Vitro.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Unexplained vision loss after silicone oil removal is a well-documented but incompletely understood entity for which there is no effective treatment described in the existing literature. We present a case where intensive oral and periocular steroid treatment resulted in significant subjective and objective clinical improvement. Observations: After successful pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil endotamponade to repair a macula sparing retinal detachment, the patient's best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 with silicone oil in the operative eye. However, seven weeks after uncomplicated combined silicone oil removal and cataract extraction with intraocular lens insertion, best corrected visual acuity was 20/250 with no new ophthalmic pathology to explain the vision loss. After a four week course of oral prednisone and three periocular triamcinolone injections over a period of nine weeks, visual acuity improved to 20/25 -2 in the operative eye. Serial multifocal electroretinography initially showed severely diminished amplitudes but improved markedly over the course of steroid treatment. Conclusions and Importance: Although no effective treatments are described in the existing literature, improvement in visual acuity, visual field, and electroretinogram in this case suggests that intensive steroid treatment (periocular and systemic) may be efficacious in treating unexplained vision loss after silicone oil removal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.