ArticleDigital health
Toward reliable diabetes prediction: Innovations in data engineering and machine learning applications.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A multi-organ atlas of microcirculatory signatures for systemic profiling of diabetic and therapeutic states.Scientific data · 2026Article
- An interpretable progressive residual network for automated multiclass diabetes diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-driven Identification of the Honeymoon Phase in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes and Optimizing Insulin ManagementJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based stratification of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes progression.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- A hybrid ensemble approach for diabetes prediction using consensus-based feature selection.Digital healthArticle
- Brain tumor classification using fine-tuned transfer learning models on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Diabetes is a metabolic disorder that causes the risk of stroke, heart disease, kidney failure, and other long-term complications because diabetes generates excess sugar in the blood. Machine learning (ML) models can aid in diagnosing diabetes at the primary stage. So, we need an efficient ML model to diagnose diabetes accurately. Methods: In this paper, an effective data preprocessing pipeline has been implemented to process the data and random oversampling to balance the data, handling the imbalance distributions of the observational data more sophisticatedly. We used four different diabetes datasets to conduct our experiments. Several ML algorithms were used to determine the best models to predict diabetes faultlessly. Results: The performance analysis demonstrates that among all ML algorithms, random forest surpasses the current works with an accuracy rate of 86% and 98.48% for Dataset 1 and Dataset 2; extreme gradient boosting and decision tree surpass with an accuracy rate of 99.27% and 100% for Dataset 3 and Dataset 4, respectively. Our proposal can increase accuracy by 12.15% compared to the model without preprocessing. Conclusions: This excellent research finding indicates that the proposed models might be employed to produce more accurate diabetes predictions to supplement current preventative interventions to reduce the incidence of diabetes and its associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.