Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Organisational learning from the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a qualitative interview study.

Felicity Southworth, Daljinder Chalmers, Gabriel Reedy, Richard Amlôt, Elena Skryabina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Felicity SouthworthBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, Science Group, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, United Kingdom.
Daljinder ChalmersBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, Science Group, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, United Kingdom.
Gabriel ReedyCentre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard AmlôtBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, Science Group, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, United Kingdom.
Elena SkryabinaBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, Science Group, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

System learning from major incidents is essential for enhancing preparedness for responding to future adverse events. Sharing learning not only stimulates further improvements, preventing the repetition of mistakes, but may also promote collaboration and the adoption of evidenced-based best practises. As part of a qualitative interview study designed to explore lessons learned, this paper describes the experiences and perspectives of 30 staff from the public health agency responsible for the national COVID-19 response in the United Kingdom. The focus of the interviews was on enabling factors and practises that worked well, as well as those that were more challenging, and which, if addressed, could improve responses to future infectious disease incidents. The interviews elicited valuable insights across various thematic areas that could inform emergency preparedness activities for future infectious disease outbreaks. The outcomes of this study, while integral for the UK agency responsible for public health, extend beyond organisational boundaries and contribute to a broader spectrum of activities aimed at facilitating global learning from the COVID-19 response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public HealthQualitative ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicLearningMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomCOVID-19COVID-19 lessonslearning from COVID-19major incidenceOrganisational learningpublic healthpublic health learningqualitative phenomenological study

Identifiers

PMID39175900
PMCPMC11339791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.