ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Prediction of adenomyosis according to revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment features.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment selection for adenomyosis based on imaging findings and patient characteristics.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Transvaginal Sonographic Features of Diffuse Adenomyosis and Associated Symptoms in 18-30-Year-Old Nulligravid Women Without Endometriosis: Is Our Diagnosis Still Valid 10 Years Later? A Re-Evaluation of Previous Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Shorter Anogenital Distance in Women with Adenomyosis Diagnosed by MUSA 2022 Criteria: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to predict the diagnosis of adenomyosis by revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features in individuals who had hysterectomy. Methods: This was retrospective cohort research conducted at a tertiary facility. Between January 2022 and January 2023, 196 individuals who had hysterectomy were analyzed in the research. The revised definitions of MUSA features of the adenomyosis approach were used to record the direct and indirect results of the sonography. The cases were classified as Group 1 (adenomyosis; Results: Hyperechogenic islands and echogenic subendometrial buds and lines were the most predictive direct features ( Conclusion: This study shows that combinations with a total number of features >4 can be practically used in the evaluation of adenomyosis using the revised definitions of MUSA features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.