ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Enhancing the ophthalmic AI assessment with a fundus image quality classifier using local and global attention mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of image quality (IQA) plays a pivotal role in the realm of image-based computer-aided diagnosis techniques, with fundus imaging standing as the primary method for the screening and diagnosis of ophthalmic diseases. Conventional studies on fundus IQA tend to rely on simplistic datasets for evaluation, predominantly focusing on either local or global information, rather than a synthesis of both. Moreover, the interpretability of these studies often lacks compelling evidence. In order to address these issues, this study introduces the Local and Global Attention Aggregated Deep Neural Network (LGAANet), an innovative approach that integrates both local and global information for enhanced analysis. Methods: The LGAANet was developed and validated using a Multi-Source Heterogeneous Fundus (MSHF) database, encompassing a diverse collection of images. This dataset includes 802 color fundus photography (CFP) images (302 from portable cameras), and 500 ultrawide-field (UWF) images from 904 patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and glaucoma, as well as healthy individuals. The assessment of image quality was meticulously carried out by a trio of ophthalmologists, leveraging the human visual system as a benchmark. Furthermore, the model employs attention mechanisms and saliency maps to bolster its interpretability. Results: In testing with the CFP dataset, LGAANet demonstrated remarkable accuracy in three critical dimensions of image quality (illumination, clarity and contrast based on the characteristics of human visual system, and indicates the potential aspects to improve the image quality), recording scores of 0.947, 0.924, and 0.947, respectively. Similarly, when applied to the UWF dataset, the model achieved accuracies of 0.889, 0.913, and 0.923, respectively. These results underscore the efficacy of LGAANet in distinguishing between varying degrees of image quality with high precision. Conclusion: To our knowledge, LGAANet represents the inaugural algorithm trained on an MSHF dataset specifically for fundus IQA, marking a significant milestone in the advancement of computer-aided diagnosis in ophthalmology. This research significantly contributes to the field, offering a novel methodology for the assessment and interpretation of fundus images in the detection and diagnosis of ocular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.