Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175798›Full record

ArticleJournal of migration and health2024

The effectiveness of

Susan Hillis, Sydney Tucker, Nicole Baldonado, Evgenia Taradaika, Lyudmyla Bryn, Svitlana Kharchenko, Tetiana Machabelii, Roisin Taylor, Phil Green, Philip Goldman and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of migration and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Susan HillisGlobal Reference Group on Children Affected by Crisis, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sydney TuckerCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicole BaldonadoWorld Without Orphans, Ukraine.
Evgenia TaradaikaWorld Without Orphans, Ukraine.
Lyudmyla BrynChildren's Mission, Ukraine.
Svitlana KharchenkoUkraine Without Orphans, Ukraine.
Tetiana MachabeliiNehemiah, Ukraine.
Roisin TaylorCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Phil GreenVIVA International, India.
Philip GoldmanMaestral International, United States.
Isang AwahCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Joshua BaldonadoWorld Without Orphans, Ukraine.
Praveen GomezWorld Without Orphans, Ukraine.
Seth FlaxmanDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oliver RatmannDepartment of Mathematics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Jamie M LachmanCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andres VillavecesDivision of Violence Prevention, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lorraine SherrUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Lucie CluverCentre for Evidence-Based Social Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nearly one in six children lived in war zones in 2023. Evidence-based psychosocial and parenting support has potential to mitigate negative impacts for parents and children co-exposed to war and displacement, especially in relation to mental health and harsh parenting reactions. In the current war in Ukraine, local mental health experts co-created and evaluated, with global experts, the effectiveness of psychosocial and parenting support groups, called Methods: Participants ( Findings: Compared to baseline, every mental health, parenting, and child health outcome improved significantly at midline and endline. Mental health ratings showed endline reductions in depressive symptoms of 56.8% (95% CI: -59.0,-54.3; -1.8 days/week), and increases in hopefulness, coping with grief, and self-care, ranging from 62.0% (95% CI: 53.6,71.3; 2.2 days/week) to 77.0% (95% CI: 66.3,88.3; 2.2 days/week). Significant improvements in parenting and child health outcomes included monitoring children, reinforcing positive behavior, supporting child development, protecting child, nonviolent discipline, and child verbalizing emotions. By endline, emotional violence, physical violence, and child despondency had dropped by 57.7% (95% CI: -63.0%,-51.9; -1.3 days/week), 64.0% (95% CI: -79.0,-39.5; -0.22 days/week), and 51.9% (95% CI: -45.1,-57.9; -1.2 days/week), respectively. Outcomes stratified by displacement status remained significant across all groups, as did those according to facilitator type (lay versus professional). Interpretation: This study demonstrates preliminary evidence, using a brief survey and pre-post design as is appropriate for acute and early protracted emergency settings, of the feasibility and effectiveness of Hope Groups for war-affected Ukrainian caregivers, on improved mental health, positive parenting, and reduced violence against children.

Indexed as

AbuseArmed conflictChildrenInternally displacedInterventionMental healthParentingPsychosocialRefugeesViolenceWar

Identifiers

PMID39175798
PMCPMC11340612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.