Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175783›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Dissociating Cerebellar Regions Involved in Formulating and Articulating Words and Sentences.

Oiwi Parker Jones, Sharon Geva, Susan Prejawa, Thomas M H Hope, Marion Oberhuber, Mohamed L Seghier, David W Green, Cathy J Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Oiwi Parker JonesWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-9837
Sharon GevaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-7048
Susan PrejawaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4402-2397
Thomas M H HopeWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-8545
Marion OberhuberWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-0191
Mohamed L SeghierHealthcare Engineering Innovation Center (HEIC), Biomedical Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1146-8800
David W GreenExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7152-1485
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-4835

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated which parts of the cerebellum are involved in formulating and articulating sentences using (i) a sentence production task that involved describing simple events in pictures; (ii) an auditory sentence repetition task involving the same sentence articulation but not sentence formulation; and (iii) an auditory sentence-to-picture matching task that involved the same pictorial events and no overt articulation. Activation for each of these tasks was compared to the equivalent word processing tasks: noun production, verb production, auditory noun repetition, and auditory noun-to-picture matching. We associate activation in bilateral cerebellum lobule VIIb with sequencing words into sentences because it increased for sentence production compared to all other conditions and was also activated by word production compared to word matching. We associate a paravermal part of right cerebellar lobule VIIIb with overt motor execution of speech, because activation was higher during (i) production and repetition of sentences compared to the corresponding noun conditions and (ii) noun and verb production compared to all matching tasks, with no activation relative to fixation during any silent (nonspeaking) matching task. We associate activation within right cerebellar Crus II with covert articulatory activity because it activated for (i) all speech production more than matching tasks and (ii) sentences compared to nouns during silent (nonspeaking) matching as well as sentence production and sentence repetition. Our study serendipitously segregated, for the first time, three distinct functional roles for the cerebellum in generic speech production, and it demonstrated how sentence production enhanced the demands on these cerebellar regions.

Indexed as

cerebellumcortexfMRIpicture descriptionsentence processingspeech production

Identifiers

PMID39175783
PMCPMC11338308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.