Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175759›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Initial clinical evidence on biperiden as antiepileptogenic after traumatic brain injury-a randomized clinical trial.

Maira Licia Foresti, Eliana Garzon, Mariana Teichner de Moraes, Rafael P S Valeriano, João Paulo Santiago, Gustavo Mercenas Dos Santos, Natália Mata Longo, Carla Baise, Joaquina C Q F Andrade, Maria Alice Susemihl and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BDNF/TrkB activators in Parkinson's disease: A new therapeutic strategy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Maira Licia Foresti *Neurology Neuroscience Postgraduation Program, Physiology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eliana Garzon *Department of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana Teichner de MoraesDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael P S ValerianoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Paulo SantiagoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Mercenas Dos SantosDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natália Mata LongoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla BaiseDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joaquina C Q F AndradeDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Alice SusemihlAssociação Brasileira de Epilepsia, São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia da Costa LeiteDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria da Graça Naffah MazzacorattiNeurology Neuroscience Postgraduation Program, Physiology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Almir Ferreira de AndradeDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manuel Jacobsen TeixeiraDepartment of Neurology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz E MelloNeurology Neuroscience Postgraduation Program, Physiology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently no efficacious intervention for preventing post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE). Preclinical studies support the potential use of anticholinergics for this condition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of biperiden as an intervention for preventing PTE. A randomized, double-blinded clinical trial was conducted at HC/FMUSP between 2018-2022. Adults with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) were randomly assigned to receive biperiden or placebo, for 10 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of PTE while the secondary outcomes included the frequency of seizures, the frequency of any adverse events and mortality after 24 months. The study was powered at a planned enrolment of 132 patients. The trial began in January 2018 and was halted by researchers on March 2020 (and terminated in December 2022) in the face of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, 123 participants were randomized and 112 contributed with data for modified mITT analysis, being that 61 (49.5%) participants completed the 24-month follow-up consult. Data analysis indicated lack of evidence of biperiden for either, the incidence of post-traumatic epilepsy (2.6, 95%CI, 0.65-10.57;

Indexed as

acute traumatic brain injuryanticholinergicbiperidenepilepsypost traumatic epilepsyseizure

Identifiers

PMID39175759
PMCPMC11339878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.