Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175712›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Prediction of malignant risk stratification model for parotid gland nodules based on clinical and conventional ultrasound features: construction and validation.

Tian Gao, Yiqun Lin, Wenbao Li, Yan Zhang, Junlai Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tian GaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiqun LinDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wenbao LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan Zhang *Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Junlai Li *Department of Ultrasound, The Second Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound is widely used in the examination of the parotid gland, but no single ultrasound feature has demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic performance in predicting the nature of parotid nodules. Unlike the established and widely used grading systems for breast and thyroid nodules, a universally adopted and clinically accepted risk stratification system for malignancy in parotid gland nodules remains absent at present. This study aims to establish a malignant risk stratification model for parotid nodules by analyzing patients' clinical features and conventional ultrasound image characteristics. Methods: In this study, clinical data and ultrasound images of 736 patients with parotid nodules were retrospectively analyzed. Pathological results served as the gold standard, and the patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical and ultrasound features of parotid nodules in the training group were compared. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was employed to screen for risk factors of malignant nodules and quantify scores. The probability of malignant risk was assessed and classified into five grades (Grade 1, normal parotid; Grade 2, definitive benign; Grade 3, possibly benign; Grade 4, suspicious malignant; Grade 5, high probability of malignancy). The diagnostic performance of the model was assessed by using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curves, and clinical impact curves. Results: Facial symptoms, unclear margin, irregular shape, microcalcification, and abnormal cervical lymph nodes were independent risk factors for malignant parotid nodules. The area under the curve of the model was 0.850 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.816-0.879] in the training group and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.791-0.891) in the validation group. Conclusions: The malignancy risk stratification model based on clinical and ultrasound image features has a good differentiation between benign and malignant parotid nodules, which is helpful for diagnosis and guiding clinical treatment.

Indexed as

clinical featuresConventional ultrasounddifferential diagnosisparotid nodulesrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39175712
PMCPMC11336789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.