ArticleGland surgery2024
Prediction of malignant risk stratification model for parotid gland nodules based on clinical and conventional ultrasound features: construction and validation.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential Diagnosis of Parotid Tumors on Ultrasound: Interobserver Variability and Examiner-Specific Decision Rules-A Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The diagnostic value of convolutional neural networks in thyroid cancer detection using ultrasound images.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound is widely used in the examination of the parotid gland, but no single ultrasound feature has demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic performance in predicting the nature of parotid nodules. Unlike the established and widely used grading systems for breast and thyroid nodules, a universally adopted and clinically accepted risk stratification system for malignancy in parotid gland nodules remains absent at present. This study aims to establish a malignant risk stratification model for parotid nodules by analyzing patients' clinical features and conventional ultrasound image characteristics. Methods: In this study, clinical data and ultrasound images of 736 patients with parotid nodules were retrospectively analyzed. Pathological results served as the gold standard, and the patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups in a 7:3 ratio. Clinical and ultrasound features of parotid nodules in the training group were compared. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was employed to screen for risk factors of malignant nodules and quantify scores. The probability of malignant risk was assessed and classified into five grades (Grade 1, normal parotid; Grade 2, definitive benign; Grade 3, possibly benign; Grade 4, suspicious malignant; Grade 5, high probability of malignancy). The diagnostic performance of the model was assessed by using calibration curves, receiver operating characteristic curves, decision curves, and clinical impact curves. Results: Facial symptoms, unclear margin, irregular shape, microcalcification, and abnormal cervical lymph nodes were independent risk factors for malignant parotid nodules. The area under the curve of the model was 0.850 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.816-0.879] in the training group and 0.846 (95% CI: 0.791-0.891) in the validation group. Conclusions: The malignancy risk stratification model based on clinical and ultrasound image features has a good differentiation between benign and malignant parotid nodules, which is helpful for diagnosis and guiding clinical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.