Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175704›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

The reinforced pedicle technique: a case report of secondary mastopexy following nipple-sparing mastectomy with autologous breast reconstruction.

Isobel Yeap, Debanjan Ghosh, Elle Vandervord, Vlad Illie

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isobel YeapDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9554-2264
Debanjan GhoshDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4321-6966
Elle VandervordDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0397-6011
Vlad IllieDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Immediate autologous reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is challenging in the ptotic breast due to the large skin envelope and reduced vascular supply to the nipple areolar complex (NAC). Patients with significant ptosis who want to preserve their NACs are often advised to undergo a two-stage procedure: first, a mammoplasty is performed to lift the NAC, and second, a delayed NSM with autologous reconstruction is performed. Unfortunately, patients with active cancer cannot delay their mastectomy; as such, they are often treated with skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) instead. Case Description: The reinforced pedicle is an innovative technique that allows the NAC to be safely raised after NSM with immediate free flap reconstruction. In the first stage, patients with ptotic breasts undergo NSM and immediate autologous reconstruction. The reconstruction itself also appears ptotic, but the dermal blood supply to the NAC is preserved. In the second stage, the ptotic free flap reconstruction is revised using the reinforced pedicle technique, which allows the flap to be reduced and the nipple raised in the manner of a standard superior pedicle breast reduction. Using this technique, we have successfully raised a patient's NAC by 2.5 cm. Conclusions: The reinforced pedicle technique adds to the scant literature on secondary revision techniques after autologous breast reconstruction. While further research on this technique is needed, it has the potential to alter the paradigm of immediate autologous reconstruction in the ptotic breast, allowing such patients to preserve their native NACs.

Indexed as

Breast reconstructioncase reportfree tissue flapsmammoplastymicrosurgical free flap

Identifiers

PMID39175704
PMCPMC11336791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.