ArticleGland surgery2024
Comparison of thyroid surgery techniques: a retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis of traditional electric knife
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive model for increased postoperative drainage volume in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, advancements in surgical techniques for thyroidectomy have led to varying outcomes and efficiencies. Understanding these differences is crucial to optimize patient care and surgical success. This study compared intra- and postoperative parameters of thyroid surgery for thyroidectomy or thyroid cancer. One approach involved the traditional electric knife, employing traditional clamp-ligation skills and an electric knife. The other approach utilized straight bipolar electrocoagulation forceps for micro-hemostasis and micro-cutting. Methods: Data were analyzed retrospectively for 228 patients who underwent thyroidectomy at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from January 2014 to November 2018. Surgery was performed either as traditional open surgery (n=150) or as a meticulous anatomical procedure involving bipolar electrocoagulation (n=78). In addition, data from published studies comparing the two surgical procedures were meta-analyzed. Results: The bipolar electrocoagulation procedure was associated with significantly shorter total operation time, lower intraoperative blood loss and lower rate of hypocalcemia. The two procedures were associated with similar rates of hoarseness. Meta-analysis of eight studies involving 2,080 patients showed that bipolar electrocoagulation was associated with significantly shorter total operation time than the traditional approach (mean difference =-21.29 min, 95% CI: -26.32 to -16.27) and with less intraoperative bleeding (mean difference =-12.87 min, 95% CI: -23.81 to -1.93). Conclusions: Straight bipolar electrocoagulation forceps can be used to perform fine dissection during thyroid surgery. Performing "micro-hemostasis" and "micro-cutting" manipulations with these straight bipolar forceps can smoothly dissect nerves and parathyroid glands and may reduce intraoperative bleeding, operation time and rates of postoperative complications, might accelerate recovery after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.