ArticleGland surgery2024
The application of methylene blue location technique in deep-seated benign breast tumor resection under endoscopy: a retrospective, single-institution analysis.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic curative excision of benign breast diseases (BBDs) can preserve the cosmetic appearance of the breast. However, endoscopic surgery is not feasible, and some challenges still need to be addressed. Traditional line marker localization methods cannot visualize tumors, and the exploration of deep tumors may lead to certain risks of accidental injury. This study aimed to investigate the value of the methylene blue location (MBL) technique in endoscopic resection of deep-seated benign breast tumors. Methods: A total of 217 patients with benign deep breast tumors admitted to the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between November 2017 and June 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 107 patients underwent endoscopic resection with a MBL, in which methylene blue was injected to guide the tumor resection endoscopically, whereas 110 patients underwent endoscopic resection with a skin mark location (SML), in which the tumor was located by a marking line on the skin. We compared patient characteristics, surgery-related data, complications, and cosmetic outcomes between the two groups. Results: Endoscopic breast tumor resection was successfully performed in 217 patients, none of whom had undergone open surgery. The mean operation time was significantly different between the MBL and SML groups (45.70±12.508 and 49.59±10.997 min, respectively; P=0.008<0.05), and blood loss in the MBL group was significantly reduced compared with that in the SML group (11.07±5.665 and 13.83±7.918 mL, respectively; P=0.004<0.05). There were no significant differences in drainage volume, length of hospital stay, or postoperative complications between the MBL and SML groups (P>0.05). The postoperative cosmetic outcomes of the patients were noteworthy, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions: The methylene blue positioning technique is safe and effective for the endoscopic treatment of deep breast tumors. It shortens operation time, reduces surgical complications, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.