ArticleRSC advances2024
Application of natural zeolite adsorption in cooperation with photosynthesis for the post-treatment of microbial fuel cells.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) are a promising technology that directly converts organic matter (OM) in wastewater into electricity while simultaneously degrading contaminants. However, MFCs are insufficient for the removal of nitrogenous compounds. Therefore, the post-treatment of MFCs is essential. This study was the first to use natural zeolite adsorption integrated with photosynthesis (ZP) for post-treating MFCs. In this system, no external energy was required; instead, natural light was used to promote the growth of photosynthetic microorganisms, thereby enhancing contaminants removal through the photosynthesis process. To assess the effectiveness of the method, comparisons were conducted under two conditions: dark (no photosynthesis) and light (with photosynthesis). In darkness, extending hydraulic retention time (HRT) enhanced COD and BOD removal by 19.8% and 28.9%, respectively. When exposed to natural light, improvements were even more notable, with COD and BOD removal reaching 32% and 40%, respectively. In both conditions, the method effectively removed NH
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.