ArticleFrontiers in physiology2024
Characterising cerebrovascular reactivity and the pupillary light response-a comparative study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Smooth muscle is integral to multiple autonomic systems, including cerebrovascular dynamics through vascular smooth muscle cells and in ocular muscle dynamics, by regulating pupil size. In the brain, smooth muscle function plays a role in cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) that describes changes in blood vessel calibre in response to vasoactive stimuli. Similarly, pupil size regulation can be measured using the pupillary light response (PLR), the pupil's reaction to changes in light levels. The primary aim of this study was to explore the interplay between cerebral blood flow and pupil dynamics, evaluated using CVR and PLR, respectively. Methods: A total of 20 healthy adults took part in a CVR gas stimulus protocol and a light and dark flash PLR protocol. CVR was calculated as the blood flow velocity change in the middle cerebral artery, measured using transcranial Doppler ultrasound in response to a 5% increase in CO Results: CVR and PLR metrics were all within the expected physiological ranges for healthy adults. Nine different PLR metrics, assessed through the light and dark flash protocols, were compared against CVR. A significant negative relationship was observed between the latency of the PLR in the dark flash protocol and CVR. No statistically significant relationships were found between CVR and other PLR metrics. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate the relationship between cerebral blood flow and pupil dynamics. A significant relationship between dark flash latency and CVR was observed. Future work includes evaluating these relationships using more robust CVR and PLR measurement techniques in a larger, more diverse cohort. Notably, more research is warranted into the PLR using a dark flash protocol and its connection to cerebrovascular function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.