Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175521›Full record

ArticleGates open research2024

Development of a core outcome set for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats.

Veronica Pingray, Karen Klein, Juan Pedro Alonso, María Belizan, Gabriella Radice, Magdalena Babinska, Mabel Berrueta, Mercedes Bonet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Veronica Pingray *Department of Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, City of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7889-2825
Karen Klein *Department of Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, City of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4619-5432
Juan Pedro AlonsoDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, City of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina.
María BelizanDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, City of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina.
Gabriella RadiceSpanish and Portuguese Department, New York University, New York, New York, 10003, USA.
Magdalena BabinskaUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mabel Berrueta *Department of Maternal and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, City of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7915-5643
Mercedes Bonet *UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal and perinatal health is often directly and indirectly affected during infectious disease epidemics. Yet, a lack of evidence on epidemics' impact on women and their offspring delays informed decision-making for healthcare providers, pregnant women, women in the post-pregnancy period and policy-makers. To rapidly generate evidence in these circumstances, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats. Methods: We will conduct a Systematic Review and a four-stage modified Delphi expert consensus. The systematic literature will aim to inform experts on outcomes reported in maternal and perinatal research and surveillance during previous epidemics. The expert consensus will involve two individual, anonymous online surveys to rate outcomes' importance and suggest new ones, one virtual meeting to discuss disagreements, and one in-person meeting to agree on the final COS, outcomes definitions and measurement methods. Four panels will be established to participate in the modified Delphi with expertise in (a) maternal and perinatal health, (b) neonatal health, (c) public health and emergency response, and (d) representation of civil society. We will recruit at least 20 international experts for each stakeholder group, with diverse backgrounds and gender, professional, and geographic balance. Only highly-rated outcomes (with at least 80% of ratings being 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale) and no more than 10% of low ratings (1-3) will be included in the final COS. Conclusions: Implementing this COS in future maternal and perinatal research and surveillance, especially in the context of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats, will facilitate the rapid and systematic generation of evidence. It will also enhance the ability of policy-makers, healthcare providers, pregnant women and women in the post-pregnancy period and their families to make well-informed choices in challenging circumstances.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueMaternal HealthConsensusEpidemicsFemaleHumansPregnancyResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topiccore outcome setepidemicsinfectiousModified Delphi processnewbornPregnancysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39175521
PMCPMC11339271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.