Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175491›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Discrimination of 14 olive cultivars using morphological analysis and machine learning algorithms.

Konstantinos N Blazakis, Danil Stupichev, Maria Kosma, Mohamad Ali Hassan El Chami, Anastasia Apodiakou, George Kostelenos, Panagiotis Kalaitzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantinos N BlazakisDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.
Danil StupichevDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.
Maria KosmaDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.
Mohamad Ali Hassan El ChamiDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.
Anastasia ApodiakouDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.
George KostelenosKostelenos Olive Nurseries, Poros, Greece.
Panagiotis KalaitzisDepartment of Horticultural Genetics and Biotechnology, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh), Chania, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional morphological analysis is a widely employed tool for the identification and discrimination of olive germplasm by using morphological markers which are monitored by subjective manual measurements that are labor intensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, an automated methodology can quantify the geometrical features of fruits, leaves and endocarps with high accuracy and efficiency in order to define their morphological characteristics. In this study, 24 characteristics for fruits, 16 for leaves and 25 for endocarps were determined and used in an automated way with basic classifiers combined with a meta-classsifier approach. This resulted to the discrimination of 14 olive cultivars utilizing data obtained from two consecutive olive growing periods. The cultivar classification algorithms were based on machine learning techniques. The 95% accuracy rate of the meta-classifier approach indicated that was an efficient tool to discriminate olive cultivars. The contribution of each morphological feature to cultivar discrimination was quantified, and the significance of each one was automatically detected in a quantitative way. The higher the contribution of each feature, the higher the significance for cultivar discrimination. The identification of most cultivars was guided by the features of both endocarps and fruits, while those of leaves were only efficient to identify the Kalamon cultivar. The combined use of morphological features of three olive organs might have an additive effect leading to higher capacity for discrimination of cultivars. The proposed methodology might be considered a phenomics tool for olive cultivar identification and discrimination in a wide range of applications including breeding.

Indexed as

image analysismachine learningmorphological analysisolive cultivar identificationolive endocarpolive fruitolive leaf

Identifiers

PMID39175491
PMCPMC11340652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.