ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024
Discrimination of 14 olive cultivars using morphological analysis and machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric Properties of Olive (Olea europaea) Pits: A Dataset for Cultivar Identification and Analysis.Scientific data · 2026Article
- High-throughput olive germplasm classification using morphological phenotyping and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Application of the OliveID morphometric tool for the identification of archaeobotanical carbonized olive endocarps: evidence for morphological continuity with the modern Throumbolia cultivar.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Olive Variety Classification and Prediction From 3D Morphology of Fruit and Stone: A Study Case on Five South Italy Autochthone Cultivars.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- DNA-Barcoding for Cultivar Identification and Intraspecific Diversity Analysis of Agricultural Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- An integrated approach using morphological, biochemical, and RAPD markers to assess the genetic diversity of Olive (Olea Europaea L.) cultivars in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional morphological analysis is a widely employed tool for the identification and discrimination of olive germplasm by using morphological markers which are monitored by subjective manual measurements that are labor intensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, an automated methodology can quantify the geometrical features of fruits, leaves and endocarps with high accuracy and efficiency in order to define their morphological characteristics. In this study, 24 characteristics for fruits, 16 for leaves and 25 for endocarps were determined and used in an automated way with basic classifiers combined with a meta-classsifier approach. This resulted to the discrimination of 14 olive cultivars utilizing data obtained from two consecutive olive growing periods. The cultivar classification algorithms were based on machine learning techniques. The 95% accuracy rate of the meta-classifier approach indicated that was an efficient tool to discriminate olive cultivars. The contribution of each morphological feature to cultivar discrimination was quantified, and the significance of each one was automatically detected in a quantitative way. The higher the contribution of each feature, the higher the significance for cultivar discrimination. The identification of most cultivars was guided by the features of both endocarps and fruits, while those of leaves were only efficient to identify the Kalamon cultivar. The combined use of morphological features of three olive organs might have an additive effect leading to higher capacity for discrimination of cultivars. The proposed methodology might be considered a phenomics tool for olive cultivar identification and discrimination in a wide range of applications including breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.