ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Imaging features and clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules in children.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trajectories of pulmonary subsolid nodules in children and adolescents: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Pediatric lung ground glass nodules: a real-world, large-scale CT cohort analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Pulmonary nodules in chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis-the importance of considering histoplasmosis in endemic regions: comment on the article by Hospach et al.ACR open rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the widespread use of computed tomography (CT), the detection rate of pulmonary nodules in children has gradually increased. Due to the lack of epidemiological evidence and clinical guideline on pulmonary nodule treatment in children, we aimed to provide a reference for the clinical diagnosis and management of pediatirc pulmonary nodules. Methods: This retrospective study collected consecutive cases from April 2012 to July 2021 in the Shanghai Children's Medical Center. The sample included children with pulmonary nodules on chest CT scans and met the inclusion criteria. All patients were categorized into tumor and non-tumor groups by pre-CT clinical diagnosis. Nodule characteristics between groups were analyzed. To establish a clinical assessment model for the benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules, patients who have been followed-up for three months were detected and a decision tree model for nodule malignancy prediction was constructed and validated. Results: The sample comprised 1341 patients with an average age of 7.2 ± 4.6 years. More than half of them (51.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies before CT scan. 48.3% were diagnosed with non-tumor diseases or healthy. Compared to non-tumor group, children with tumor were more likely to have multiple nodules in both lungs, with larger size and often be accompanied by osteolytic or mass lesions. Based on the decision tree model, patients' history of malignancies, nodules diameter size≥5mm, and specific nodule distribution (multiple in both lungs, multiple in the right lung or solitary in the upper or middle right lobe) were important potential predictors for malignity. In the validation set, sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 0.855, 0.833 and 0.828 (95%CI: 0.712-0.909), respectively. Conclusion: This study conducted a clinical assessment model to differentiate benignity and malignancy of pediatric pulmonary nodules. We suggested that a nodule's diameter, distribution and patient's history of malignancies are predictable factors in benign or malignant determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.