Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175260›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Closure methods for large defects after gastrointestinal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Rui Gong, Simiao Wang, Jiugang Song, Zhen He, Peng Li, Shutian Zhang, Xiujing Sun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Postlobectomy bronchoesophageal fistula treated with endoscopic helical tacking system and anchor-pronged clip.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A >30-cm circumferential rectal laterally spreading tumor treated with multitunnel endoscopic submucosal dissection and suturing.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rui GongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3984-6877
Simiao WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jiugang SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Zhen HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Peng LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2927-2758
Shutian ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2356-4397
Xiujing SunDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases; State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health; Beijing Digestive Disease Center; Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Z191100006619082National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2400100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is commonly performed for the removal of large gastrointestinal lesions. Endoscopic mucosal defect closure after ESD is vital to avoid adverse events. In recent years, many innovative instruments have emerged and proved to be beneficial. In this paper, we conducted a thorough literature review and summarized the closure methods for large-size post-ESD mucosal defects over decades. We separated these methods into five categories based on the operational principle: "side closure" method, "ring closure" method, "layered closure" method, "hand suturing closure" method, and "specially designed device closure" method. Side closure with clips assisted by instruments such as threads or loops is applicable for each segment of the gastrointestinal tract to prevent postoperative bleeding. If the defect tension is too large to close with the traditional side closure methods, zigzag closure and ring closure could be applied to gather the bilateral defect edges together and achieve continuous closure. In the stomach and rectum with a high risk of submucosal dead space between the submucosa and muscular layers, side closure methods with muscle layer grasping clip or layered closure methods could enable the involvement of the deep submucosa and muscle layers. The ring closure method and specially designed devices including over-the-scope clip, Overstitch, and X-tack could resolve perforation effectively. Individual closure method requires endoscope reinsertion or sophisticated operation, which may be limited by the deep location and the narrow lumen, respectively. Although specially designed devices are expected to offer promising prospectives, the cost-effectiveness remains to be a problem.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionWound Closure TechniquesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastric MucosaHumansIntestinal MucosaPostoperative HemorrhageSurgical InstrumentsSuture Techniquesclosure techniquesendoscopic closureendoscopic submucosal dissectionendoscopic suturinggastrointestinal lesions

Identifiers

PMID39175260
PMCPMC11660212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.