Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175188›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

Routine Hearing Screening for Older Adults in Primary Care: Insights of Patients and Clinic Personnel.

Mina Silberberg, Anisha Singh, Janet Prvu Bettger, Sherri L Smith, Howard W Francis, Judy R Dubno, Kristine A Schulz, Rowena J Dolor, Amy R Walker, Debara L Tucci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the accuracy of a self-administered smartphone hearing test application in a geriatric population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mina SilberbergDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anisha SinghDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Janet Prvu BettgerDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Sherri L SmithDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Howard W FrancisDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2340-4721
Kristine A SchulzDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Rowena J DolorDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Amy R WalkerDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Debara L TucciDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Addressing Barriers to Adult Hearing HealthcareR33DC015003 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCIS, HOWARD W, SMITH, SHERRI L. · 2017 to 2020
$2.2M
Addressing Barriers to Adult Hearing HealthcareR21DC015003 · NIDCD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TUCCI, DEBARA L., WITSELL, DAVID L · 2016 to 2016
$246k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015003NIDCD NIH HHS R33 DC015003NIH HHS R21DC015003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesHearing loss frequently goes undiagnosed and untreated, with serious sequelae. Hearing screening facilitates diagnosis and treatment but is not routinely conducted in primary care. This study addresses the attitudes and insights of patients and primary care clinic personnel relative to the routinization of hearing screening in primary care for older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsData presented are from the qualitative portion of a larger study. The main study compared screening completion for 3 approaches to coordinating telephone-based hearing screening with primary care-1 offering hearing screening within the primary care encounter and 2 providing information for at-home screening ( 1 with and 1 without provider encouragement). Focus groups/interviews were conducted with personnel (n = 38) at the 6 participating clinics, patients who completed screening and were referred for diagnosis (n = 14), and patients who did not complete screening (n = 10). Analysis used the general inductive approach.

resultsMost patients had unaddressed hearing concerns prior to the study. Negative attitudes toward hearing loss/treatment were common, and experiences of family and friends influenced attitudes, but lack of urgency was the primary barrier to screening completion. Respondents favored routine primary care-based hearing screening for older adults, but clinic personnel noted challenges of time, space, workflow, and reimbursement. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings favor greater routinization of hearing screening in primary care. Routinization will be enhanced by improved reimbursement for screening and follow-up; specialist engagement with primary care and the public (including leveraging older adults' social networks); and further research on specific integration options.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHearing LossHearing TestsMass ScreeningPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchClinic perspectivesHearing lossPatient perspectivesPractice change

Identifiers

PMID39175188
PMCPMC11446169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.