Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175127›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Cross-cultural validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale in Korea.

Sojin Yang, Yoon Jung Chang, Kyung Ok Kim, Beom Hee Lee, Sun-Young Kong, Marion McAllister, In Hee Choi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Survey research in genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sojin YangDepartment of Genetic Counseling, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon Jung ChangNational Cancer Survivorship Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Kyung Ok KimCollege of Nursing, Kyungbok University, Namyangju-si, Korea.
Beom Hee LeeMedical Genetics Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sun-Young KongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
Marion McAllisterCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
In Hee ChoiDepartment of Genetic Counseling, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5740-6368

Funding

National Cancer Center 2210870National Cancer Center 23F1620-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) was developed to measure patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of genetic counseling and testing services. In the current study, the Korean version of GCOS (K-GCOS) was developed to reflect the sociocultural characteristics of Korea, and its clinical applicability was assessed. Overall, 231 Koreans, including patients with genetic diseases and their family members, participated and completed the K-GCOS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scale, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Validity was examined by assessing the correlations between K-GCOS scores and other relevant scale scores. Reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest scores, measured over 2 weeks. We performed exploratory factor analysis of the five structures of GCOS-24. For K-GCOS, four-factor structures were identified: "cognitive-behavioral control," "uncertainty about control," "hope," and "emotional regulation." Four original GCOS-24 items were removed because of low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. K-GCOS-20 scores were positively correlated with SWLS (r = 0.456) and MHLC-internal (r = 0.213) scores but negatively correlated with HADS (anxiety r = -0.428, depression r = -0.469) and MHLC-internal (r = -0.278) scores. These findings demonstrate that K-GCOS-20 is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating genetic counseling services in Korea.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonGenetic CounselingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsRepublic of KoreaSurveys and Questionnairesempowermentgenetic counselinggenetic counselorsgenetics services

Identifiers

PMID39175127
PMCPMC11923504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.