Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39175077›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2024

Universal testing in endometrial cancer in Sweden.

Emil Andersson, Anne Keränen, Kristina Lagerstedt-Robinson, Sam Ghazi, Annika Lindblom, Emma Tham, Miriam Mints

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emil Andersson *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. emil.andersson@regionstockholm.se.
Anne Keränen *Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina Lagerstedt-RobinsonDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sam GhaziDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annika LindblomDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma ThamDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Miriam MintsDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. miriam.mints@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to test a universal screening strategy on endometrial cancer to evaluate its effectiveness to find Lynch Syndrome (LS) cases to two established clinical criteria: Amsterdam II criteria, and the revised Bethesda criteria to select cases for prescreening with immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cases were subsequently screened for germline disease causing variants regarding the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes.

methodsIHC was performed on 221 endometrial cancer (EC) cases, using antibodies against the DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. MMR loss was found in 54 cases, and gene mutation screening was undertaken in 52 of those.

resultsIn this set of patients, the use of Amsterdam II criteria detected two (0.9%), the Bethesda criteria two (0.9%), and universal testing five (2.3%) cases of LS. The combination of universal testing and family history criteria resulted in detection of five patients (2.3%) with LS.

conclusionsBased on our results and other similar studies to date we propose a screening protocol for LS on EC tumors with prescreening using IHC for the four MMR proteins on all new EC cases diagnosed before 70 years of age, followed by mutation screening of all tumors with loss of MSH2 and/or MSH6 or only PMS2, plus consideration for mutation screening of all LS genes in cases fulfilling the clinical Amsterdam II criteria regardless of MMR status on IHC.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerLynch syndromeUniversal testing

Identifiers

PMID39175077
PMCPMC11342736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.