ArticleGenome biology2024
Real-time identification of epistatic interactions in SARS-CoV-2 from large genome collections.
Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-dependent effects of recombinant spike protein-based vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary dynamics and the emergence of variants in hamster models.The Journal of general virology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary dynamics under phenotypic uncertainty.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From single-sequences to evolutionary trajectories: protein language models capture the evolutionary potential of SARS-CoV-2.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Evolution of BA.2.86 to JN.1 reveals that functional changes in non-structural viral proteins are required for fitness of SARS-CoV-2.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- What Has SARS-CoV-2 Taught Us About Evolution?Cureus · 2025Review
- A general and biomedical perspective of viral quasispecies.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- The importance of epistasis in the evolution of viral pathogens.Virus evolution · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has highlighted the importance of genomic epidemiology in understanding the evolution of pathogens and guiding public health interventions. The Omicron variant in particular has underscored the role of epistasis in the evolution of lineages with both higher infectivity and immune escape, and therefore the necessity to update surveillance pipelines to detect them early on.
resultsIn this study, we apply a method based on mutual information between positions in a multiple sequence alignment, which is capable of scaling up to millions of samples. We show how it can reliably predict known experimentally validated epistatic interactions, even when using as little as 10,000 sequences, which opens the possibility of making it a near real-time prediction system. We test this possibility by modifying the method to account for the sample collection date and apply it retrospectively to multiple sequence alignments for each month between March 2020 and March 2023. We detected a cornerstone epistatic interaction in the Spike protein between codons 498 and 501 as soon as seven samples with a double mutation were present in the dataset, thus demonstrating the method's sensitivity. We test the ability of the method to make inferences about emerging interactions by testing candidates predicted after March 2023, which we validate experimentally.
conclusionsWe show how known epistatic interaction in SARS-CoV-2 can be detected with high sensitivity, and how emerging ones can be quickly prioritized for experimental validation, an approach that could be implemented downstream of pandemic genome sequencing efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.