ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2024
Evaluation of targeted sequencing for pathogen identification in bone and joint infections: a cohort study from China.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of targeted nanopore sequencing in pathogen detection in patients with sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Global trends in the application of nanopore sequencing technology in the detection of infectious disease pathogens: a bibliometric analysis from 2014 to 2024.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical validation and utility of targeted nanopore sequencing for rapid pathogen diagnosis and precision therapy in lung cancer patients with pulmonary infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Pathogen spectrum identified by targeted nanopore sequencing and exploratory analysis of hematological biomarkers in suspected intracranial infections.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBone and joint tuberculosis (BJTB) is a distinct variant of tuberculosis in which clinical diagnosis often leads to relative misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the targeted nanopore sequencing (TNPseq) assay for BJTB patients in China.
methodThe study enrolled a cohort of 163 patients with suspected BJTB. Diagnostic testing was performed using the TNPseq assay on samples including punctured tissue, pus, and blood. The diagnostic accuracy of the TNPseq assay was then compared with that of the T-SPOT and Xpert MTB/RIF assays.
resultTNPseq exhibited superior performance in terms of accuracy, demonstrating a sensitivity of 76.3% (95% CI: 71.0-81.6%) and a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 93.5-100%) in clinical diagnosis. When evaluated against a composite reference standard, TNPseq demonstrated a sensitivity of 74.4% (95% CI: 69.3-79.5%) and a specificity of 98.8% (95% CI: 93.7-100%). These results exceed the performance of both the T-SPOT and Xpert MTB/RIF tests. Notably, TNPseq demonstrated high specificity and accuracy in puncture specimens, with a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI: 70.2-79.8%) and a specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 92.7-100%), as well as in pus samples, with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI: 78.6-88.1%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 100-100%). Additionally, TNPseq facilitated the detection of mixed infection scenarios, identifying 20 cases of bacterial-fungal co-infection, 17 cases of bacterial-viral co-infection, and two cases of simultaneous bacterial-fungal-viral co-infection.
conclusionTNPseq demonstrated great potential in the diagnosis of BJTB due to its high sensitivity and specificity. The ability of TNPseq to diagnose pathogens and detect drug resistance genes can also guide subsequent treatment. Expanding the application scenarios and scope of TNPseq will enable it to benefit more clinical treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.