Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39174991›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2024

Engineering a non-oxidative glycolysis pathway in escherichia coli for high-level citramalate production.

Tingting Wang, Lijuan Ding, Huiying Luo, Huoqing Huang, Xiaoyun Su, Yingguo Bai, Tao Tu, Yuan Wang, Xing Qin, Honglian Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tingting WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Lijuan DingState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huiying LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huoqing HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaoyun SuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yingguo BaiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Tao TuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuan WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xing QinState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Honglian ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yaru WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bin YaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jie ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China. zhangjie09@caas.cn.
Xiaolu WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.2 Yuanmingyuan West Road, Haidian district, Beijing, 100193, China. wangxiaolu@caas.cn.

Funding

Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program CAAS-ZDRW202304China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-41National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD1301001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethyl methacrylate (MMA) is a key precursor of polymethyl methacrylate, extensively used as a transparent thermoplastic in various industries. Conventional MMA production poses health and environmental risks; hence, citramalate serves as an alternative bacterial compound precursor for MMA production. The highest citramalate titer was previously achieved by Escherichia coli BW25113. However, studies on further improving citramalate production through metabolic engineering are limited, and phage contamination is a persistent problem in E. coli fermentation.

resultsThis study aimed to construct a phage-resistant E. coli BW25113 strain capable of producing high citramalate titers from glucose. First, promoters and heterologous cimA genes were screened, and an effective biosynthetic pathway for citramalate was established by overexpressing MjcimA3.7, a mutated cimA gene from Methanococcus jannaschii, regulated by the BBa_J23100 promoter in E. coli. Subsequently, a phage-resistant E. coli strain was engineered by integrating the Ssp defense system into the genome and mutating key components of the phage infection cycle. Then, the strain was engineered to include the non-oxidative glycolysis pathway while removing the acetate synthesis pathway to enhance the supply of acetyl-CoA. Furthermore, glucose utilization by the strain improved, thereby increasing citramalate production. Ultimately, 110.2 g/L of citramalate was obtained after 80 h fed-batch fermentation. The citramalate yield from glucose and productivity were 0.4 g/g glucose and 1.4 g/(L·h), respectively.

conclusionThis is the highest reported citramalate titer and productivity in E. coli without the addition of expensive yeast extract and additional induction in fed-bath fermentation, emphasizing its potential for practical applications in producing citramalate and its derivatives.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliFermentationGlucoseGlycolysisMetabolic EngineeringBiosynthetic PathwaysMalatesPromoter Regions, GeneticcitramalateGlucoseMalatesAcetyl-CoACitramalateCitramalate synthaseEscherichia coliNOG pathway

Identifiers

PMID39174991
PMCPMC11340173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.