ArticleBMC oral health2024
Remineralizing effect of NSF on artificial enamel caries.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodological Heterogeneity in Profilometric Assessment of Experimentally Demineralized Enamel as a Model of White Spot Lesions: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Antibacterial effects and remineralization potential of silver nanoparticles in a novel nanosilver fluoride formulation.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- An in vitro study on the remineralization effects of er, cr: YSGG laser combined with fluoride varnish on enamel.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the remineralization potential of different bioactive glass varnishes on white spot lesions: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The impact of fluorinated graphene versus nanohydroxyapatite crystals on artificial white spot lesion microhardness and color change.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionNanotechnology offers new approaches and endless opportunities for remineralizing tooth decay without being toxic or causing allergies. This study aimed to determine the effect of nanosilver fluoride (NSF) on the remineralization potential of enamel caries-like lesions compared to 5% sodium fluoride varnish in permanent teeth.
methodsFifteen teeth (molars and premolars) were gathered, cleaned, and polished using a scaler. After sectioning the teeth mesiodistally and removing the roots, the thirty specimens were subjected to a demineralized solution to induce early enamel lesions and then assigned randomly into two equal groups. The test materials were applied, and then all the specimens were subjected to a pH cycling model for 30 days. DIAGNOdent and surface roughness were investigated, and an evaluation of the enamel Ca and P weight% for Ca/P ratio calculation was done using SEM-EDX to analyze the specimens at the end of the study. The data were analyzed using an independent t-test.
resultsThe mean values for the DIAGNOdent measurements for NSF and NaF at baseline and after demineralization were not significantly different (p > 0.05). After treatment, NaF varnish showed a significantly higher mean DIAGNOdent measurement (11.8 ± 5.80) than NSF (4.7 ± 1.6). The mean surface roughness of the NaF group (1.64 ± 0.39) was much higher than NSF's mean surface roughness (1.07 ± 0.21). Specimens treated with NSF had statistically significant smoother surfaces (p < 0.001). The NSF group had a higher mean Ca/P ratio (2.9 ± 0.35) than NaF (2.2 ± 0.11). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.012).
conclusionThe study reveals that nano silver fluoride is a more effective treatment than sodium fluoride varnish in enhancing teeth's clinical characteristics, particularly in terms of mineral content and surface roughness, suggesting it could be an improved strategy to prevent dental caries and maintain enamel integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.